THE FALSTAFFIAN STATE
The character of Falstaff became a legend in Shakespeare's
own life-time. The larger-than-life immoral tutor to Hal, the future Henry
V, revels in a life of sack-drinking and thieving. The scenes at the Boar's
Head form a counterpoint to an ideal, official England that is gradually
constructed throughout the tetralogy of history plays - Richard II,
Henry IV Parts One and Two, and Henry V.
Sack
Falstaff's favourite drink is 'sack', a generic
term for sweet wine. He gives this eulogy to it:
Prince John: Fare you well,
Falstaff. I, in my condition,
Shall better speak of you than you deserve.
Exeunt all but Falstaff
Falstaff: I would
you had the wit; 'twere better than your dukedom. Good faith, this
same young sober-blooded boy doth not love me, nor a man cannot
make him laugh - but that's no marvel, he drinks no wine. There's
never none of these demure boys come to any proof, for thin drink
doth so over-cool their blood, and making many fish meals, that
they fall into a kind of male green-sickness; and then when they
marry they get wenches. They are generally fools and cowards - which
some of us should be too, but for inflammation. A good sherris-sack
hath a twofold operation in it. It ascends me into the brain, dries
me there all the foolish and dull and crudy vapours which environ
it, makes it apprehensive, quick, forgetive, full of nimble, fiery,
and delectable shapes, which delivered o'er to the voice, the tongue,
which is the birth, becomes excellent wit. The second property of
your excellent sherris is the warming of the blood, which before,
cold and settled, left the liver white and pale, which is the badge
of pusillanimity and cowardice; but the sherris warms it, and makes
it course from the inwards to the parts' extremes. It illumineth
the face, which as a beacon, gives warning to all the rest of this
little kingdom, man, to arm; and then the vital commoners, and inland
petty spirits, muster me all to their captain, the heart, who, great
and puffed up with this retinue, doth any deed of courage; and this
valour comes of sherris. So that the skill in the weapon is nothing
without sack, for that sets it a-work, and learning a mere hoard
of gold kept by a devil, till sack commences it and sets it in act
and use. Hereof comes it that Prince Harry is valiant; for the cold
blood he did naturally inherit of his father he hath like lean,
sterile, and bare land manured, husbanded, and tilled, with excellent
endeavour of drinking good and good store of fertile sherris, that
he is become very hot and valiant. If I had a thousand sons, the
first human principle I would teach them should be to forswear thin
potations, and to addict themselves to sack.
2 Henry IV, 4.3.85-122. |
Falstaff would not have been alone in believing
sack possessed magical qualities. Some fifty years later, a writer
records the life of a doctor who went amongst plague victims, armed
only with a swig of sack:
‘Minor plague outbreaks of 1645 were at Derby
and Oxford. Of the latter we have a glimpse from Willis of Christ
Church. "Sometime past in this city [Oxford] viz., 1645, the plague
(tho' not great) had spread. Doctor Henry Sayer, a very learned physician,
and happy in his practice, many others refusing this province, boldly
visited all the sick, poor as well as rich, daily administered to
them physic, and handled with his own hands their buboes and virulent
ulcers, and so cured very many sick by his sedulous though dangerous
labour. That he might fortifie himself against the contagion, before
he went into the infected houses, he was wont only to drink a large
draught of sack, and then his perambulation about the borders of death
and the very jaws of the grave being finished, to repeat the same
antidote."' (Quoted in Creighton, A History of Epidemics, (1891),
p.559) |
Falstaff spends his time idly tippling.
Both the medical literature (below) and legal literature
of the time view the taverns and alehouses of the time as dens of
iniquity, and some of the language Hal attacks Falstaff with is
part of this moral environment. For instance, ‘the first original
English writer on the pox', William Clowes, in A short and profitable
Treatise touching the cure of the disease called (Morbus Gallicus)
by unctions, London, 1579 - identifies the source of the pox's
spread as 'lewd alehouses', peopled as it is with 'lewd and idell
persons':
‘According to the following passage, St Bartholomew's
Hospital, to which Clowes was surgeon, was three parts occupied
by patients suffering from this malady: - "It is wonderfull to consider
how huge multitudes there be of such as be infected with it, and
that dayly increase, to the great daunger of the common wealth,
and the stayne of the whole nation: the cause whereof I see none
so great as the licentious and beastly disorder of a great number
of rogues and vagabondes: The filthye lyfe of many lewd and idell
persons, both men and women, aboutt he citye of London, and the
great number of lewd alehouses, which are the very nests and harbourers
of such filthy creatures; By meanes of which disordered persons
some other of better disposition are many tymes infected, and many
more lyke to be, except there be some speedy remedy provided for
the same."' [disease called variously Morbus Gallicus or Morbus
Neapolitanus, that is, the French or Neapoliton disease, more properly
Lues Venera] (Creighton, A History of Epidemics, p.424)
|
Licensing of Alehouses etc.
(All material taken from Statutes at Large, London,
1786)
The first Act relating to the licensing of alehouses
is 11 Henry VII c.2 (1496)
Significantly, it is part of legislation to deal
with vagabonds etc. - an indication of the low social status of
the alehouse and its clientele. Its position at the end makes it
look like an afterthought.
'Vagabonds, idle, and suspected Persons, shall be
set in the Stocks, Three Days and Three Nights, and have none other
Sustenance but Bread and Water, and then shall be put out of the
Town; And whosoever shall give such idle Person more, shall foreit
xii. d. Every Begganr not able to work, shall resort to the Hundred
where he last dwelled, is best known, or was born, and there remain,
upon the Pain aforesaid. ... No Artificer, Labourer, or Servant,
shall play at any unlawful Game, but in Christmas. ... Two
Justices of Peace may reject common selling of Ale, etc.'
This Act is altered by 5 &
6 Ed. 6. c.25 (1552), 'For Keepers of Alehouses
and Tiplinghouses to be bound by Recognisance'
'Forasmuch as intolerable Hurts and Troubles to
the Commonwealth of this Realm doth daily grow and increase through
such Abuses and Disorders as are had and used in common Alehouses
and other Houses called Tiplinghouses:'...
JPs are given power 'to remove, discharge and put
away common selling of Ale and Beer in the said common Alehouses
and Tiplinghouses, in such Town or Towns and Places, where they
shall think meet and convenient: And that none after the first Day
of May next coming shall be admitted or suffered to keep
any common Alehouse or Tiplinghouse, but such as shall be thereunto
admitted and allowed int he open Sessions of the Peace, or else
by two Justices of the Peace'...
The justices are to 'take Bond and Surety from Time
to Time by Recognisance of such as shall be admitted and allowed
hereafter to keep any common Alehouse or Tiplinghouse, as well for
and aginst the using of unlawful Gamdes, as also for the using and
Maintenance of good Order and Rule to be had and used within the
same, as by their Discretion shall be though necessary and convenient;
for making of every which Recognisance, the Party or Parties that
shall be so bound shall pay but twelve pence.'
This Act therefore firmly put alehouse and tiplinghouse
landlords firmly in the power of the JPs.
The following year 1553
'taverns' were brought under control, 7 Edward
6. c.5 in 'The Act to avoid the excessive
Prices of Wine'.
Inns remained
exempt since they served the legitimate function of providing refreshments
and lodging for travellers, as Justice Salkeld adjudged in Stephens
versus Watson [Mich. 13 Will. 3] Referring to a later piece
of legislation, 1 Jac. 1 c.9 (see below), he says: 'This statute
extends not to inns, for they are for lodging of travellers; but
if an inn degenerate to an ale-house, by suffering disorderly tippling,
etc. it shall be deemed as such'. [An early version of the 'bona
fide' traveller legislation so beloved in the Victorian period]
The preamble to 1 Jac. 1 c.9,
(1604), an Act designed to strengthen the Acts above, are
slightly later than the two Henry IV plays, and reads as
if aimed directly at Falstaff:
An Act to restrain the inordinate Haunting and Tipling
in Inns, Alehouse, and other Victualling Houses
'Whereas the ancient, true and principal Use of
Inns, Alehouse and Victualling-houses was for the Receit, Relief
and Lodging of Wayfaring People travelling from Place to Place,
and for such Supply of the Wants of such People as are not able
by greater Quantities to make their Provision of Victuals, and not
meant for Entertainment and Harbouring of lewd and idle People to
spend and consume their Money and their Time in lewd and drunken
Manner.'
There were many acts during James I's reign targetting
alehouses (a sign of how ineffectual they were in reality), and
we also get the first act specific to drunkenness. Its definition
of 'drunkenness' as the source of many other sins was typical moral
rhetoric, authorised by the bible.
4 Jac. I c.5 (1606)
An Act for repressing the odious and loathsome Sin
of Drunkenness
'Whereas the loathsome and odious Sin of Drunkenness
is of late grown into Common Use within this Realm, being the Root
and Foundation of many other enormous Sins, as Blood-shed, Stabbing,
Murder, Swearing, Fornication, Adultery, and such like, to the great
Dishonour of God, and of our Nation, the Overthrow of many good
Arts and manual Trades, the Disabling of divers Workmen, and the
general Impoverishing of many good Subjects, abusively wasting the
good Creations of God'. |
|