THE FALSTAFFIAN STATE 
          
         
      The character of Falstaff became a legend in Shakespeare's 
        own life-time. The larger-than-life immoral tutor to Hal, the future Henry 
        V, revels in a life of sack-drinking and thieving. The scenes at the Boar's 
        Head form a counterpoint to an ideal, official England that is gradually 
        constructed throughout the tetralogy of history plays - Richard II, 
        Henry IV Parts One and Two, and Henry V.  
        
      Sack 
      Falstaff's favourite drink is 'sack', a generic 
        term for sweet wine. He gives this eulogy to it: 
      Prince John: Fare you well, 
        Falstaff. I, in my condition, 
        Shall better speak of you than you deserve.   
     
Exeunt all but Falstaff  
      
         
          |   Falstaff: I would 
              you had the wit; 'twere better than your dukedom. Good faith, this 
              same young sober-blooded boy doth not love me, nor a man cannot 
              make him laugh - but that's no marvel, he drinks no wine. There's 
              never none of these demure boys come to any proof, for thin drink 
              doth so over-cool their blood, and making many fish meals, that 
              they fall into a kind of male green-sickness; and then when they 
              marry they get wenches. They are generally fools and cowards - which 
              some of us should be too, but for inflammation. A good sherris-sack 
              hath a twofold operation in it. It ascends me into the brain, dries 
              me there all the foolish and dull and crudy vapours which environ 
              it, makes it apprehensive, quick, forgetive, full of nimble, fiery, 
              and delectable shapes, which delivered o'er to the voice, the tongue, 
              which is the birth, becomes excellent wit. The second property of 
              your excellent sherris is the warming of the blood, which before, 
              cold and settled, left the liver white and pale, which is the badge 
              of pusillanimity and cowardice; but the sherris warms it, and makes 
              it course from the inwards to the parts' extremes. It illumineth 
              the face, which as a beacon, gives warning to all the rest of this 
              little kingdom, man, to arm; and then the vital commoners, and inland 
              petty spirits, muster me all to their captain, the heart, who, great 
              and puffed up with this retinue, doth any deed of courage; and this 
              valour comes of sherris. So that the skill in the weapon is nothing 
              without sack, for that sets it a-work, and learning a mere hoard 
              of gold kept by a devil, till sack commences it and sets it in act 
              and use. Hereof comes it that Prince Harry is valiant; for the cold 
              blood he did naturally inherit of his father he hath like lean, 
              sterile, and bare land manured, husbanded, and tilled, with excellent 
              endeavour of drinking good and good store of fertile sherris, that 
              he is become very hot and valiant. If I had a thousand sons, the 
              first human principle I would teach them should be to forswear thin 
              potations, and to addict themselves to sack. 
            2 Henry IV, 4.3.85-122.  | 
         
       
        
      
         
          |   Falstaff would not have been alone in believing 
              sack possessed magical qualities. Some fifty years later, a writer 
              records the life of a doctor who went amongst plague victims, armed 
              only with a swig of sack: 
            ‘Minor plague outbreaks of 1645 were at Derby 
            and Oxford. Of the latter we have a glimpse from Willis of Christ 
            Church. "Sometime past in this city [Oxford] viz., 1645, the plague 
            (tho' not great) had spread. Doctor Henry Sayer, a very learned physician, 
            and happy in his practice, many others refusing this province, boldly 
            visited all the sick, poor as well as rich, daily administered to 
            them physic, and handled with his own hands their buboes and virulent 
            ulcers, and so cured very many sick by his sedulous though dangerous 
            labour. That he might fortifie himself against the contagion, before 
            he went into the infected houses, he was wont only to drink a large 
            draught of sack, and then his perambulation about the borders of death 
            and the very jaws of the grave being finished, to repeat the same 
            antidote."' (Quoted in Creighton, A History of Epidemics, (1891), 
            p.559)  | 
         
       
        
      
         
          |   Falstaff spends his time idly tippling. 
              Both the medical literature (below) and legal literature 
              of the time view the taverns and alehouses of the time as dens of 
              iniquity, and some of the language Hal attacks Falstaff with is 
              part of this moral environment. For instance, ‘the first original 
              English writer on the pox', William Clowes, in A short and profitable 
              Treatise touching the cure of the disease called (Morbus Gallicus) 
              by unctions, London, 1579 - identifies the source of the pox's 
              spread as 'lewd alehouses', peopled as it is with 'lewd and idell 
              persons': 
             ‘According to the following passage, St Bartholomew's 
              Hospital, to which Clowes was surgeon, was three parts occupied 
              by patients suffering from this malady: - "It is wonderfull to consider 
              how huge multitudes there be of such as be infected with it, and 
              that dayly increase, to the great daunger of the common wealth, 
              and the stayne of the whole nation: the cause whereof I see none 
              so great as the licentious and beastly disorder of a great number 
              of rogues and vagabondes: The filthye lyfe of many lewd and idell 
              persons, both men and women, aboutt he citye of London, and the 
              great number of lewd alehouses, which are the very nests and harbourers 
              of such filthy creatures; By meanes of which disordered persons 
              some other of better disposition are many tymes infected, and many 
              more lyke to be, except there be some speedy remedy provided for 
              the same."' [disease called variously Morbus Gallicus or Morbus 
              Neapolitanus, that is, the French or Neapoliton disease, more properly 
              Lues Venera] (Creighton, A History of Epidemics, p.424) 
               | 
         
       
        
      Licensing of Alehouses etc. 
      (All material taken from Statutes at Large, London, 
        1786) 
      
         
          |   The first Act relating to the licensing of alehouses 
              is 11 Henry VII c.2 (1496) 
            Significantly, it is part of legislation to deal 
              with vagabonds etc. - an indication of the low social status of 
              the alehouse and its clientele. Its position at the end makes it 
              look like an afterthought. 
            'Vagabonds, idle, and suspected Persons, shall be 
              set in the Stocks, Three Days and Three Nights, and have none other 
              Sustenance but Bread and Water, and then shall be put out of the 
              Town; And whosoever shall give such idle Person more, shall foreit 
              xii. d. Every Begganr not able to work, shall resort to the Hundred 
              where he last dwelled, is best known, or was born, and there remain, 
              upon the Pain aforesaid. ... No Artificer, Labourer, or Servant, 
              shall play at any unlawful Game, but in Christmas. ... Two 
              Justices of Peace may reject common selling of Ale, etc.' 
              
            This Act is altered by 5 & 
              6 Ed. 6. c.25 (1552), 'For Keepers of Alehouses 
              and Tiplinghouses to be bound by Recognisance' 
            'Forasmuch as intolerable Hurts and Troubles to 
              the Commonwealth of this Realm doth daily grow and increase through 
              such Abuses and Disorders as are had and used in common Alehouses 
              and other Houses called Tiplinghouses:'...  
            JPs are given power 'to remove, discharge and put 
              away common selling of Ale and Beer in the said common Alehouses 
              and Tiplinghouses, in such Town or Towns and Places, where they 
              shall think meet and convenient: And that none after the first Day 
              of May next coming shall be admitted or suffered to keep 
              any common Alehouse or Tiplinghouse, but such as shall be thereunto 
              admitted and allowed int he open Sessions of the Peace, or else 
              by two Justices of the Peace'... 
            The justices are to 'take Bond and Surety from Time 
              to Time by Recognisance of such as shall be admitted and allowed 
              hereafter to keep any common Alehouse or Tiplinghouse, as well for 
              and aginst the using of unlawful Gamdes, as also for the using and 
              Maintenance of good Order and Rule to be had and used within the 
              same, as by their Discretion shall be though necessary and convenient; 
              for making of every which Recognisance, the Party or Parties that 
              shall be so bound shall pay but twelve pence.'  
            This Act therefore firmly put alehouse and tiplinghouse 
              landlords firmly in the power of the JPs. 
            The following year 1553 
              'taverns' were brought under control, 7 Edward 
              6. c.5 in 'The Act to avoid the excessive 
              Prices of Wine'.  
            Inns remained 
              exempt since they served the legitimate function of providing refreshments 
              and lodging for travellers, as Justice Salkeld adjudged in Stephens 
              versus Watson [Mich. 13 Will. 3] Referring to a later piece 
              of legislation, 1 Jac. 1 c.9 (see below), he says: 'This statute 
              extends not to inns, for they are for lodging of travellers; but 
              if an inn degenerate to an ale-house, by suffering disorderly tippling, 
              etc. it shall be deemed as such'. [An early version of the 'bona 
              fide' traveller legislation so beloved in the Victorian period] 
              
            The preamble to 1 Jac. 1 c.9, 
              (1604), an Act designed to strengthen the Acts above, are 
              slightly later than the two Henry IV plays, and reads as 
              if aimed directly at Falstaff: 
            An Act to restrain the inordinate Haunting and Tipling 
              in Inns, Alehouse, and other Victualling Houses 
            'Whereas the ancient, true and principal Use of 
              Inns, Alehouse and Victualling-houses was for the Receit, Relief 
              and Lodging of Wayfaring People travelling from Place to Place, 
              and for such Supply of the Wants of such People as are not able 
              by greater Quantities to make their Provision of Victuals, and not 
              meant for Entertainment and Harbouring of lewd and idle People to 
              spend and consume their Money and their Time in lewd and drunken 
              Manner.' 
              
            There were many acts during James I's reign targetting 
              alehouses (a sign of how ineffectual they were in reality), and 
              we also get the first act specific to drunkenness. Its definition 
              of 'drunkenness' as the source of many other sins was typical moral 
              rhetoric, authorised by the bible. 
              
            4 Jac. I c.5 (1606) 
            An Act for repressing the odious and loathsome Sin 
              of Drunkenness 
            'Whereas the loathsome and odious Sin of Drunkenness 
              is of late grown into Common Use within this Realm, being the Root 
              and Foundation of many other enormous Sins, as Blood-shed, Stabbing, 
              Murder, Swearing, Fornication, Adultery, and such like, to the great 
              Dishonour of God, and of our Nation, the Overthrow of many good 
              Arts and manual Trades, the Disabling of divers Workmen, and the 
              general Impoverishing of many good Subjects, abusively wasting the 
              good Creations of God'.   | 
         
       
        
         
        
        
           |